AL-MUSTADRAK ALAA AL-SAHIHAIN PDF

arwiki المستدرك على الصحيحين (كتاب); enwiki Al-Mustadrak alaa al-Sahihain; fawiki المستدرک علی الصحیحین; idwiki Al-Mustadrak ala ash-Shahihain; jvwiki. Al-Hakim was a hadith scholar and hafidh from the 4th century he was a What he did (or at least intended) in his book al-Mustadrak was. Al-Mustadrak alaa al-Sahihain (Arabic: المستدرك على الصحيحين; Al-Mustadrak ‘ ala al-Sahîhayn ) is a five volume hadith collection written by Hakim al-Nishapuri .

Author: Vole Shakalrajas
Country: Republic of Macedonia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 10 March 2014
Pages: 275
PDF File Size: 19.55 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.68 Mb
ISBN: 451-6-24767-140-3
Downloads: 43481
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tanos

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Is al Hakims hadith collection Al Mustadrak reliable? I have read on Wikipedia that al dhahabi said it was better if he never complied it and ibn hajar was also dubious about it.

If al hakim grades a hadith sahih can it be trusted without verification from al dahabi abridgement of the al Mustadrak?

Al-Hakim was a hadith scholar and hafidh from the 4th century he was a student of ad-Daraqutni and a teacher of imam al-Bayhaqi.

What he did or at least intended in his book al-Mustadrak was compiling ahadith according the conditions of both sahih authors al-Bukhari and Muslimwhich neither of both have quoted.

And he finally added to his compilation some ahadith which based on his “ijtihad” should be considered as sahih. Maybe an important side note: One should know that some al-muxtadrak the scholars in the chains of both sahih books are considered as weak or worsebut most of those where teachers of al-Bukhari or Muslim, so they must know them better, and have their reasons for rejcting or affirming some of their narrations.

And even the sahih books don’t exclude weak ahadith! However the majority of scholars says that al-Hakim was very lenient in his qualification, so that the book includes many weak da’if and fabricated mawdu’ hadith.

  LA BATALLA DE LAS TERMOPILAS LIBRO PDF

To use Loot.co.za, you must have cookies enabled in your browser.

Some even accused him of being a shi’i, for example ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani wrote in lessan al-Mezan that in the last days of his life he changed apparently at the time he compiled this book. Imam ad-Dhahabi later compiled alza abridged book and called it Talkhis al-Mustadrak’ with commentaries on the ahadith. And I don’t know why, has this been hidden for him? He isn’t among those who should ignore those, so if he knew it, this would be a great betray.

However a more realistic quote comes from ad-Dahabi’s siyar a’laam an nubala’ I’ll only summarize in the following describing al-Mustadrak and commenting a negative statement about the book:. Note that some scholars even said that among those ahadith quoted in al-Mustadrak there are ahadith which are quoted in both sahihs.

For example he stated in one place in his book that Muslim quoted this hadith abridged based on the chain of Sho’aba from Qatadah – see here – which is not the case, as Muslim also quoted it with the chain Hammam from Qatadah -the first link which is actually indicating the hadith-while saying in an other place this is a sahih hadith but they al-Bukhari and Muslim didn’t quote it.

This shows that al-Hakim must have been at least forgetfull al-mustadrk the time he wrote his book or heedlessness has occured to him when he reached the age of 80 years From all this the best we can say is that al-Hakim did a big effort to find sahih ahadith which are not quoted al-xahihain al-Bukhari and Muslim and succeded to some extent and failed to some extent maybe due to his forgetfullness, his heedlessness which came with the age he began compiling his book at or maybe he even intended to create some kind of disturbance, but we have not enough evidences for the later and should assume the best.

Therefore it is not recommended to take his hadith as an evidence unless scholars like ad-Dahabi or others qualify them as authentic enough! By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you al-ahihain that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

  CAMINO A LA AUTODEPENDENCIA JORGE BUCAY PDF

Al-Mustadrak alaa al-Sahihain

Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Is al Hakims Hadith collection Al Mustadrak reliable? Hassan 3 However a more realistic quote comes from ad-Dahabi’s siyar a’laam an nubala’ I’ll only summarize in the following describing al-Mustadrak and commenting a negative statement about the book: The rest of his book are bizarre ‘ajaaib and rejected ahadith manakeer.

And among them are a hundred of ahadith which the heart would reject Conclusion From all this the best we can say is that al-Hakim did a big effort to find sahih ahadith which are not quoted by al-Bukhari and Muslim and succeded to some extent and failed to some extent maybe due to his forgetfullness, his heedlessness which came with the age he began compiling his book at or maybe he even intended to create some kind of disturbance, but we have not enough evidences for the later and should assume the best.

Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.

: Cookies

Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown.

Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service la-mustadrak, privacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Islam Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled.