By Deborah Tannen Random Fighting for Our Lives Conflict can’t be avoided in our public lives any more than we can avoid conflict with people we love. Used to express ideas; Talk about everything as if it were a war; “take a shot at it”; “I don’t want to be shot down”; train us to think about & see. Deborah Tannen Fighting for Our , Sep 21, pm, PDF Document (application/pdf), KB, dy.
|Published (Last):||9 September 2004|
|PDF File Size:||4.90 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Tannen goes on to list the repercussions of the previous observations, deboran that this increasing trend of opposition is attributed to the breakdown of our society.
Response to “Fighting for Our Lives” Deborah Tannen – houston_28
In this light, I feel she also offered her weakest example of her said point. In this article, Deborah Tannen attempts to open the eyes of the reader to the argumentative culture to which we have all become accustomed to. She states that a reporter, upon interviewing her in regard to her new published book, misquoted her. To emphasize this point, Tannen refers to a scientific study in which participants viewed deboraj video of two cars colliding. You Were Always Mom’s Favorite! You are commenting using your Twitter account.
Talking from 9 to 5. Our society has become overwhelmingly adversarial, with consequences not only in our ability to solve problems but also in our personal relationships. Create a free website or blog at WordPress. That’s Not What I Meant! In our culture, nearly every topic is emphasized as a fightong or argument in which there are definite winners and losers.
English – Professor Lombardy – Deborah Tannen Fighting for Our – History
By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. Tannen reported her reply as the necessity to distinguish between biological or cultural styles. This is vighting one of the many relevant examples Tannen utilized in her writing to illustrate her views.
She brought to light many instances of fightting automatic use of adversarial formats which we have grown to accept. While the reader is susceptible to criticizing the validity of this very writing through labeling Tannen a social skeptic, she does conclude the work with various alternate methods to this solution.
She has observed that, while conflict and opposition are needed in a dialogue just as much as cooperation and or, the scale has been tipped, with conflict and opposition being overweighed. Log in No account? Exploring how other cultures approach opposition, and discussing the influence of electronic communication in ratcheting up the level of aggression, Tannen shows how we can move toward more constructive dialogue in our public as well our private lives.
Find an Independent Bookseller Near You. The latter group edborah the cars moving at much higher speeds than the first group, illustrating the power and influence words can have on perception.
Video Lectures for Classroom Use. I had tanben Tannen would have emphasized some alternative social methods to the current ones of which she finds so unappealing.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. She highlights tznnen society has become programmed to pursue truth by the assumption that each issue has two opposing sides. Email required Address never made public. Interestingly, despite her efforts I debora her writing quite aggressive and argumentative itself. This book will change forever how you see forces that powerfully shape our lives, and suggests new ways of reaching our goals. Notify me of new comments via email. More on these will be interesting.
I liked how you kept the response clear because her paper discussed so many different contributing factors and results that it would be easy to lose focus of the main point. But, like everything in life, moderation must be applied for the tool of debate.
In her trademark clear, well-organized style, and generously using examples foor her own life, Tannen moves from arena to arena, backing her thesis with plenty of research. Abridged Audio Version read by the author. Unfortunately, her sole offering is to experiment with metaphors other than sports and war, and to utilize expressive formats others than traditional debate style.
Tannen traces this tendency to the history of our educational system, and shows its roots among boys at play. I feel a stronger example could have been used to emphasize the thought differences between men and women. Perhaps this was her underlying objective, though; the beginning of this article read as she was propelling her personal achievements and also defending them against criticism and misrepresentation.
Tannen explains that though this method has its rightful place; it is ineffective and dangerous to employ it for every situation. When asked a question pertaining to the most frequent inquiries by clients, Tannen stated that it was regarding the different conversational styles of men and women.
It also encourages people to look for irrelevant rhetorical weaknesses in the opposing argument, rather than listening to the important matters at hand. She explains how the exaggerated use of military and battle related metaphors have the power to influence and shape our opinions, thoughts, and perceptions.
You Just Don’t Understand. I found her writing intriguing and informative perhaps because it was argumentative! She relates the ineffectiveness of the typical spousal arguments to the tactics utilized in headlining public discourse. How does the AC fit into your own experience and viewpoint?
Response to Deborah Tannen’s essay: The Argument Culture
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Since community is a blend of connections and authorities, both of which are deteriorating from this adversarial attitude, alienation then forms, and the trend spirals communities into states of detachment and hostility. On various occasions you related what you were saying at the time back to the main concept. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Hi, this is a comment.
Tannen is concerned that our culture has become so accustomed to this habit of arguing that we have framed everything into a debate, in which winning or losing is the main concern.
Debodah a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here You are commenting using your WordPress.