printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Earman, John. World enough and space-time. ” Bradford. World Enough and Spacetime. John Earman. MIT press () John Earman – – International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2) – John Earman, World Enough and Space-time: Absolute vs. relational theories of Theories of Space and Time: A Review of John Earman’s “World Enough and .
|Published (Last):||24 September 2004|
|PDF File Size:||12.67 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.11 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Redhead – – Philosophy of Science 59 4: Space and Time in Philosophy of Physical Science. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute vs. Relational Theories of Space and Time
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
John Earman manages to present the dpacetime technical and metaphysical issues of the Absolutist-Relationalist debate in a readable, and accurate manner.
Roberts – – Philosophy of Science 70 3: In Search of Spacetime Structuralism. Space and Time in Philosophy of Physical Science categorize this paper. This is both a wonderful introduction to the contemporary discussion and an engaging and lovably readable historical survey of the debate.
Henrynavarre added it Jul 13, The conclusion Earman offers in the final chapters presents the state of the debate in a very convincing light given the arguments presented on both sides, for Earman the classical forms of both the absolutist and relationalist fail to hold, and that we must move forward to reveal a third position.
Neverdust marked it as to-read Sep 09, Find it on Scholar. David Knight – – Philosophical Books 32 3: Relational Theories of Space and Time.
Jan 20, lucas rated it it was ok Shelves: Worls Rynasiewicz – – Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 3: Structural Explanations in Minkowski Spacetime: Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion. Incredibly powerful counterarguments are presented against both positions, most notably that relationalism cannot account for centrifugal forces and the field theory approach of modern physics, while absolutism cannot rescue determinism from the jaws spaacetime the hole argument.
The Singular Nature of Space-Time. Citing articles via Web of Science 4. Isabelle added it Sep 25, During the first half of the book, one can’t help but feel that Earman is being a bit biased towards the absolutist side of the debate, but during the later chapters where Einstein’s hole argument is introduced, this bias vanishes completely leading to the impression that Earman is simply being critical of fallacious arguments.
Vincent Lam – – Philosophy of Science 74 5: Mark Hogarth – – Psa Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. Laura Ruetsche – – Philosophy of Science 73 5: Most users should sign in with their email address.
World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute vs. Relational Theories of Space and Time by John Earman
Rynasiewicz – – Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 3: Justin added it Dec 13, Added to PP index Total downloads 2of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? John Earman University of Pittsburgh.
This article has no associated abstract. Want to Read saving…. Nick Huggett – Dimitris rated it it was ok Sep 16, Michael Mcdonough marked it as to-read Aug 14, Antonio Bosnjak marked it as to-read Aug 02,